Vanessa loved her burrito:

I loved mine too:

This close up shows you some more delicious details:

The burning question, of course is if London’s Burritos are as good as California’s. The short answer is no. The best burrito I’ve had was from a store near Sunnyvale. This wasn’t as good as that, but it was significantly better that the surprisingly OK burritos in Detroit airport.

Admittedly I’m no burrito expert - I throw down the gauntlet to burrito aficionados Mikel (who made me my first burrito), and Steve (who likes burritos a lot). Will be waiting to hear what they have to say.

View Larger Map

Google’s real location is here.

The OSM South East London mapping party will aim to fill in the blanks in the OSM map of the area. Greenwhich, Lewisham and Blackheath are all well covered by Yahoo!’s aerial imagery, so lots of roads have been filled in but most of them don’t have a name and there’s lots of mistakes with junctions not joining up properly and so on. We’ll also be collecting point-of-interest data; schools, hospitals, shops, pubs and restaurants all make OSM’s map richer and more useful.

There’s more details on the OSM Wiki. As always, OSM Mapping Parties are open to everyone - if you are interested, get in touch or add your name to the wiki.

Click on the link and take a look at the high resolution version and you’ll see the filth I was greeted with. Its not what you expect from a £3 tube fare, let alone a £150 flight. I called the flight attendant, who told me there was nothing he could do about it. I suggested that there must be something that could be done. He returned in a few minutes with some wet face towels. “What do you expect me to do with these?”, I asked.

“Clean the tray,” the attendant replied.

“Even RyanAir don’t make you clean your own trays,” I said.

Eventually the manager came to my seat and cleaned the tray for me, which wasn’t really good enough. There was still caked on filth which smelt like old milk all over the seat back and tray infront of me. By way of compensation the attendant offered me a glass of champagne - really not what I wanted at 7am.

When we got home, we emailed GB Airways and attached the above photo. This is the reply we received, some time later (click on the image to see it in more detail):

There’s little point in getting pissed off with stuff like this. I’ll be pretty unlikely to fly with GB Airways in the future - there is plenty of choice on the routes they operate that I take a couple of times a year from the south of Spain to the UK, and their prices would have to be substantially cheaper than anyone elses for me to risk their unique brand of in-flight filth combined with surly attendants. Thankfully, the company’s Gatwick and Manchester routes have been bought by Easyjet, who in my experience have new, quiet and clean planes.

My advice: steer clear of GB Airways.

The API has been a long time in the making, having first been announced at the OS Mashup Event last year. The API is based on the OpenLayers Javascript library, an interesting decision in itself and one which should see bug fixes and improvements fed back into OpenLayers.

Essentially, OpenSpace is just another slippy map API, with most of the features everyone’s come to expect and a few features that make it stand out. It uses the OSGB (OSTN02) datum projected onto the British National Grid (transverse mercator) rather than using WGS84 Latitudes and Longitudes and a mercator projection, as most other web mapping APIs use. To ensure compatibility with the growing volumes of geodata based on WGS84, OpenSpace includes Javascript libraries to transform from WGS84 to projected OSGB - which it seems to do pretty accurately.

Another notable point is the cartography. The Ordnance Survery have a far richer dataset at their disposal, so its not surprising that they can produce map tiles like this:

Whilst the “Street View” (the name for the highest zoom levels) cartography has been criticised by some specialists, its undoubtedly an improvement over Google’s. Its going to be interesting to see if the new map content spurs new types of mash-ups - people can now pinpoint the exact position of their houses and countryside users now have, well, something compared to the nothingness of the Google countryside. I spent at least an hour yesterday just browsing around the map - just having a nice, fullscreen slippy map of the UK is really cool. Take a look here

The license is a license, so some people are going to love it, some will hate it and most will just get on with hacking. One thing that the guys from the OS were emphasising yesterday, was that they really want people to consult with them. That’s why we were there yesterday - so that the people who made OpenSpace could see what we thought. I think the desire of the OpenSpace team to listen to people’s feedback and act on it is a genuine one, so maybe we could all try some constructive criticism before trashing it. But hey, this is the internet.

The most interesting thing about OpenSpace is that the OS own the data. Google, Yahoo, MicrosoftMultimap etc all license their data from other providers, which is why they do things like this. Google don’t want you to hate them, they want you to love them and use their services but are restricted from doing so by licensing regimes with data suppliers. The OS shouldn’t have this problem - its their data so they shouldn’t suffer from the problems that Google et al blame on their providers.

During my first play with the OpenSpace API, I stuck a pin on a map to invite you all to the ZXV christmas party, and grabbed an NPE WMS feed from GetMapping, so you can overlay 50 year old mapping onto the latest OpenSpace tiles. Take a look here.

Most of the [agricultural] subsidies and trade barriers have come at a huge cost. The trillions of dollars spent supporting farmers in rich countries have led to higher taxes, worse food, intensively farmed monocultures, overproduction and world prices that wreck the lives of poor farmers in the emerging markets. And for what? Despite the help, plenty of Western farmers have been beset by poverty. Increasing productivity means you need fewer farmers, which steadily drives the least efficient off the land.

Read the full story, here